Legal Opinion

White v. Schley

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 17, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELTZER, J.S.C.

Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the claim of plaintiff, the permissive operator of a non-owned, uninsured vehicle. The defendant asserts that plaintiff is barred from presenting the claim and that, if not barred, is unable to cross the verbal threshold. Plaintiff denies that any statute prohibits the action or that he is subject to the verbal threshold. For the reasons which follow, the motion is granted.

*583Because this is a motion for summary judgment, I am required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the resisting party and to afford to that party…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Harvey v. Essex County Board of FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Fiore v. Consolidated FreightwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. Ross v. Transport of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HERBERT HURTADO VS. JENNIFER WILKINS (L-1483-16, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  2. State v. LarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API