State v. Lark
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
117 N.J. 331 (1989)
567 A.2d 197
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WAVERLY LARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 26, 1989.
Decided December 14, 1989.
Carol M. Henderson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
Michael B. Jones, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender of New Jersey, attorney, Michael B. Jones and Marcia Blum, Assistant Deputy Public Defenders, on the letter briefs).
The opinion of the Court was…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment · Clifford; Concurring in the judgment · Clifford.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.