Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. Waldrop

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 26, 1991No. 89-1220PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This matter was here once before on an appeal and a cross-appeal. Tidwell v. Waldrop, 554 So.2d 1009 (Ala. 1989). Frank and Betty Tidwell had sued attorneys Hugh Don Waldrop and John B. Butts in a legal malpractice action. As to the appeal, we affirmed the trial court's summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants. As to the cross-appeal brought by defendant Butts, we remanded for treatment of an issue concerning the adequacy of the amount of attorney fees awarded to Butts by the trial court. The evidence was undisputed that Butts had incurred attorney fees of more than $3,000 in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ruffing v. LincicomeColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Tidwell v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Capps Trailer Sales, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Schweiger v. Town of HurtsboroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Bryan v. Green Brook ContractorsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Mahoney v. Loma Alta Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API