Legal Opinion

Opinion No. 73-170 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided August 22, 1973Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATE BOARD OF AFFAIRS — CONTRACTS

The State Board of Affairs may not enter into contracts on behalf of the State of Oklahoma which exclude the counties unless the counties themselves decide not to avail themselves of the provisions of the contracts. The Attorney General has received your letter wherein you ask, in effect, the following question: Can the State Board of Public Affairs, or its agents, accept contracts on behalf of the State in which the counties' right to avail themselves of the provisions of such contract has been deleted ? Phrased in another way, you ask whether the State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McVicker v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF COUNTY OF CADDOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Boydston v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Stephenson v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Johnson v. PfrimmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API