Legal Opinion
Affordable Housing Development Corp. v. City of Fresno
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 11, 2006No. Nos. 04-15625, 04-15644, 04-15650, 04-15683, 04-15693, 04-15753, 04-15780, 04-17130, 05-15104PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
Affordable Housing Development Corporation and its affiliate Ashwood Construction Co. (collectively AHDC) appeal the judgment of the district court, following a jury trial, in favor of defendants City of Fresno (the City) and individual council members and citizens. Holding that the district court properly reconciled the special verdicts of the jury, we affirm the judgment. Holding that there should be further consideration of the citizens’ claims for attorney fees, we remand that issue to the district court.
FACTS
In October' 1996, AHDC agreed with McCaffrey Development…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- William Leer Robert Larry Emerhiser v. Al Murphy Darrell Gardner Arvin AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Committee Concerning Community Improvement v. City of ModestoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Budnick v. Town of CarefreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Wechsler v. MacKe International Trade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Adelson v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. Village of Wesley HillsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.