Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Boutwell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 21, 2007No. 1050299Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSee, Justice

Like Justice Lyons, I concur in the holding of Part III of the main opinion' that Boutwell’s appeal was untimely, and I dissent from the holding in Part IV applying the doctrine of equitable estoppel to allow Boutwell’s appeal to proceed. I join in Justice Lyons’s writing. I write separately to express my concern with the well-intentioned departure in the main opinion from long-established and well-considered principles of equitable estoppel.

The State sought to condemn certain property owned by Boutwell. On January 26, 2004, the probate judge for Covington County signed an order condemning…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dixon County v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. First National Bank of Montgomery v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1959
  3. Moore v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. State Hwy. Dept. v. HEADRICK OUTDOOR ADV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Ex Parte FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API