Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Appeal of the Atlantic Coast Conference

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1993No. 9210PTC527Published

1Dissent

Judge McCRODDEN

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the property owned by the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC), if its expenditure of administrative funds does not violate N.C. Gen. *12Stat. § 105-278.4(a)(2) (1992), is tax exempt. Before turning to my analysis of the governing statute, I would like to join the majority in its chastising of a representative of the University of North Carolina who evaded a request by Guilford County for ACC financial data pertinent to its decision in this matter. Both the University of North Carolina and North Carolina State…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Venus Lodge No. 62 v. Acme Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. County of Rockingham v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, Inc. v. Trustees of Wake Forest CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Reynolds Foundation v. . Trustees of Wake ForestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API