Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 17, 1957No. 240PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Per curiam
We hold that the proofs justified with reason the jury’s conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500; Webb v. Illinois Central R. Co., 352 U. S. 512; Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 352 U. S. 521; Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 353 U. S. 920; Futrelle v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 353 U. S. 920; Deen v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe R. Co., 353 U. S. 925; Thomson v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 353 U. S. 926. The jury’s general verdict, that the respondent negligently contributed to the petitioner’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Brown v. Western R. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Davis v. WechslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Bender v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.