Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bowman v. Fipps

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1966No. DOCKET No. 6395; DOCKET No. 6396PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShabp, J.

The difference between the judgments tendered and the judgment which the court signed is twofold: (1) The court’s judgment directed that the premises be returned to the owners; the tendered judgment declared the place of business a nuisance. (2) The court’s judgment made no provision for the inclusion of attorney’s fee in the costs of the proceedings; the tendered judgment directed that the costs, including a fee in the “sum of $.” for John A. Dwyer, be paid from the proceeds of the sale of the personal property of the defendants Fipps and Luther Powell.

Counsel for plaintiff stressfully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Habit v. . StephensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Barker v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State ex rel. Bowman v. MalloySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State Ex Rel. Sinclair v. CroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Gilchrist v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API