State ex rel. Bowman v. Fipps
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShabp, J.
The difference between the judgments tendered and the judgment which the court signed is twofold: (1) The court’s judgment directed that the premises be returned to the owners; the tendered judgment declared the place of business a nuisance. (2) The court’s judgment made no provision for the inclusion of attorney’s fee in the costs of the proceedings; the tendered judgment directed that the costs, including a fee in the “sum of $.” for John A. Dwyer, be paid from the proceeds of the sale of the personal property of the defendants Fipps and Luther Powell.
Counsel for plaintiff stressfully…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoskins v. HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Habit v. . StephensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Barker v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State ex rel. Bowman v. MalloySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Sinclair v. CroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Gilchrist v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980