Hirsch v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
Plaintiff appeals from order of dismissal following sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend.
The complaint, the allegations of which we accept as true for the purpose of this review (O’Keefe v. Atascadero County Sanitation Dist., 21 Cal.App.3d 719, 730 [98 Cal.Rptr. 878]; Kleiner v. Garrison, 82 Cal.App.2d 442, 447 [187 P.2d 57]; Mackay v. Clark Rig Bldg. Co., 5 Cal.App.2d 44, 55 [42 P.2d 341]), contains the following. On or about March 2, 1972, Stephen Sorenz presented to the Department of Motor Vehicles (Department) certain documents written entirely in German…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Downer v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Brown v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Burns v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- MacKay v. Clark Rig Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund v. City of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Grenell v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Lundeen Coatings Corp. v. Department of Water and PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Papelian v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hill v. People Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.