Legal Opinion

Varela v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 7, 2005No. 02 C 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is Salome Varela’s amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Movant, Salome Varela (“Varela”) challenges his sentence for participating in a RICO conspiracy, kidnapping, violating the Hostage Act, assaulting a federal officer, and using a firearm during a crime of violence. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND 1

A. Facts

Varela, along with Defendants Miguel Torres (“Torres”), Jose de la Paz Sanchez (“Sanchez”), and Jesus Ruiz (“Ruiz”), acted as an…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruiz v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API