Varela v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is Salome Varela’s amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Movant, Salome Varela (“Varela”) challenges his sentence for participating in a RICO conspiracy, kidnapping, violating the Hostage Act, assaulting a federal officer, and using a firearm during a crime of violence. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND 1
A. Facts
Varela, along with Defendants Miguel Torres (“Torres”), Jose de la Paz Sanchez (“Sanchez”), and Jesus Ruiz (“Ruiz”), acted as an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ruiz v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006