Ruiz v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court are Jesus Ruiz’s, Miguel Torres’, and Jose De La Paz Sanchez’s Motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct their sentences. The court considers these Motions on a consolidated basis. Movants, Jesus Ruiz (“Ruiz”), Miguel Torres (“Torres”), ánd Jose De La Paz Sanchez (“Sanchez”), challenge their sentences for participating in a RICO conspiracy, kidnapping, violating the Hostage Act, assaulting a federal officer, and using a firearm during a crime of violence. For the reasons stated below, the Motions are denied.
I.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ruiz v. Pekin Federal Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025