Legal Opinion

Baird v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 9, 1933No. K-146PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court · GeeeNGeeeN, Judge

The plaintiff is trustee in bankruptcy for the Bickel Dredging Corporation and brings this suit to recover $62,166.12 alleged to have been due the Bickel Corporation for dredging done under a contract made with the defendant. The defendant denies any liability.

*605It appears without controversy that a written contract was entered into between the Bickel Corporation and the defendant about September 14, 1928, under which the Bickel Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the contractor, agreed to. do certain dredging in the vicinity of Norfolk harbor at an agreed price per cubic yard and in…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Green.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Jerman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  3. Veridyne Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Liquidating Trustee Ester Duval of KI Liquidation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API