Legal Opinion

Master Laboratories, Inc. v. Chesnut

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1953No. 33307PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a suit for the specific performance of an option to purchase real estate contained in a lease. The trial court denied specific performance and entered judgment against the plaintiffs for rentals that had accrued under the lease. The plaintiffs appeal.

On April 7, 1942, the plaintiffs entered into a written lease with the defendants for the use of a two-story building for a period of 10 years at the agreed rental of $110 per month. The lease contained an option to purchase which, so far as it is pertinent to this case, is as follows: “And it is further agreed that the party of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCann v. Glynn Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Telluride Power Transmission Co. v. Crane Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Callahan v. PrewittNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. S. Spiegal & Son v. AlpirnNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Arman v. Structiform Engineering Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gerdes v. Omaha Home for BoysNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bishop Cafeteria Company of Omaha v. FordNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Benedict v. Eppley Hotel CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. deNourie & Yost Homes v. FrostNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Burhoop v. PegramNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API