Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Gregory McNeil James E. Chaney, and Reginald Porter

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 14, 1990No. 87-3069, 87-3070 and 87-3080PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

Concurring Opinion filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

2Per curiam

Appellants Gregory McNeil, James Chaney, and Reginald Porter, along with others not parties to this appeal, were convicted of conspiring to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and of various substantive offenses in furtherance thereof. Their primary contention on appeal is that their convictions were obtained in violation of their right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 et seq., and the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. In the…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Felipe VegaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Louis TedescoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Rodell Eagle Hawk, A/K/A Rydell Eagle HawkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Nell Scott, United States of America v. Ronald ScottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Joseph R. KollerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. Robert A. BeckhamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API