Legal Opinion

Plouffe v. Rook

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 2, 2006No. 56232-1-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Schindler, A.C.J.

¶1 In October 1998, Darrell R. Plouffe filed a lawsuit against Paul M. Rook for injuries he sustained in a rear-end automobile collision. In February 2000, the Snohomish County Clerk sent a CR 41(b)(2) notice of dismissal for want of prosecution to Plouffe’s attorney. A month later, the court dismissed Plouffe’s lawsuit without prejudice. Five years later, Plouffe filed a motion to reinstate his lawsuit under CR 41(b)(2)(B). Plouffe claimed he did not know about the notice of dismissal and he filed a motion to reinstate as soon as he learned his lawsuit was dismissed. Relying…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plouffe v. RookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API