Legal Opinion

In re Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 30, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent is a New Jersey attorney admitted to practice in this department in 1983.

Petitioner Committee on Professional Standards moves for an order disciplining respondent pursuant to section 806.19 of this court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.19) by reason of his July 20, 1990 public reprimand by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Respondent was found guilty of neglecting real estate matters entrusted to him by four clients.

In view of respondent’s public reprimand in the State of New Jersey for professional misconduct and his failure to answer or appear in opposition to the instant application,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re ApovianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re LawlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re MazeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. In re McKennaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API