In re Mazeau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Per Curiam.
Respondent is a New Jersey attorney admitted to practice in New York by this court in 1988.
Petitioner Committee on Professional Standards moves for an order disciplining respondent pursuant to section 806.19 of this court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.19) by reason of his recent public reprimand by the Supreme Court of New Jersey for (1) knowingly making a false statement of material fact to a Trial Judge and (2) failing to disclose to the trial court a material fact with knowledge that the court may tend to be misled by such failure.
Respondent had made a motion in New Jersey Superior…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of SklarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018