Legal Opinion

Piersol v. Hays

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1943No. 16,993PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crumpacker, J. —

The appellants herein are the heirs at law and next of kin of one Oliver M. Piersol, late a resident of Hendricks County, who died testate on the 27th day of July, 1940,' and the appellee is the duly qualified and acting executor of the last will and testament of said decedent. On the 23rd day of October, 1941, the appellee filed a current report with the Hendricks Circuit Court showing that cash in the sum of $5,737.03 had come into his hands as such executor out of which he had paid the decedent’s debts in the sum of $4,246.85. Decedent’s estate, in addition to the cash…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kane v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Skinner v. SpannIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Foil v. Newsome.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Powell v. . WoodcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. West v. RassmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. University of Southern Indiana Foundation v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Mental Health Commissioner v. Estate of LottsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Chael v. Whyte (In re Whyte)District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  5. Cynthiana State Bank v. MurphyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API