Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arcelormittal v. Ak Steel Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 16, 2017No. 2016-1357Published

1DissentWallach, Circuit Judge

“If a dispute is not a proper case or controversy” under Article III of the Constitution, we “have no business deciding it.” DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 341, 126 S.Ct. 1854, 164 L.Ed.2d 589 (2006). Indeed, “[n]o principle is more fundamental to the judiciary’s proper role in our system of government.” Simon v. E. Ky. Welfare Rights Org., 426 U.S. 26, 37, 96 S.Ct. 1917, 48 L.Ed.2d 450 (1976); see Valley Forge Christian Coll. v. Ams. United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 471, 102 S.Ct. 752, 70 L.Ed.2d 700 (1982) (describing the case or controversy check…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API