Legal Opinion

Smith v. Stark

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 14, 2011No. Civ. 11-257-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Dennis L. Smith (“plaintiff’) filed the instant litigation pro se against defendants Hon. Paul S. Diamond, 1 Hon. Leonard S. Stark, 2 Hon. William B. Chandler III, 3 Hon. J. Travis Laster 4 (collectively, “the judicial defendants”), and Patricia A. Meyers “as nominal defendant” (“Meyers”). (D.I. 1, 3) Along with his amended complaint, plaintiff filed a motion for a restraining order. (D.I. 4) As this judicial officer understands his arguments, plaintiff contends that the judicial defendants have conspired to deprive…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Jean Germain v. Hon. Haekyoung Suh, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API