Legal Opinion
Perfect Pearl Co. v. Majestic Pearl & Stone, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 11, 2012No. 10 Civ. 3998(PAE)PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
Plaintiff Perfect Pearl Co. (“Perfect”) moves for leave to amend its complaint against defendant Majestic Pearl & Stone, Inc. (“Majestic”) to add claims of misuse of trademark notice and false advertising under the Lanham Act and a claim of false advertising under New York law, and to add to the factual basis for its existing claims of unfair competition under the Lanham Act and New York law. For the following reasons, Perfect’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background1
Perfect commenced this action on May 14, 2010 with the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Holmes v. GrubmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- AEP Energy Services Gas Holding Co. v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- South Cherry Street, LLC v. Hennessee Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Salomon v. Adderley Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Deskovic v. City of PeekskillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- High Point Design LLC v. Buyer's Direct, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Charter Commc'ns, Inc. v. Local Union No. 3, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.