Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Spadafora

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 13, 1983PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The issue here is whether a trust by-law adopted by the defendants, trustees of the Melrose Towers Condominium Trust (trust), limiting to two the number of units in the Melrose Towers Condominium (condominium) which may be owned by any one person or entity, represents an unreasonable restraint on alienation or operates to deny the plaintiffs equal protection of the laws or due process of law. The case was submitted to a judge of the Superior Court on a statement of agreed facts. The judge entered a judgment declaring that the by-law was “valid and not unconstitutional.” The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Noble v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. Tosney v. Chelmsford Village Condominium AssociationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Woodside Village Condominium Association, Inc. v. JahrenSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Finch v. Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API