Legal Opinion
People v. Lenoir
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Vigil, 31 AD3d 794 [2006]; People v Davis, 9 AD3d 468 [2004]; People v Rodriguez, 238 AD2d 447 [1997]). Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). We find that the jury properly credited the testimony of police witnesses…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. McHarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. ApplewhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. HickmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. BrowneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. ParnellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011