Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. Cahill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1977No. 48,187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

This proceeding in the nature of quo warranto was commenced by the state on relation of the district attorney of the twenty-ninth judicial district (Wyandotte County) to oust Shirley Cahill and Joe Mulich, the defendants-appellants, from their elective positions as members of the Board of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas. The matter was heard by three of the senior district judges of that district, sitting en banc. Judgment was entered ousting the defendants from office. They appeal and the state cross-appeals. The principal issue is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. District Court in & for Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Lane Rural High School District No. 9Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. State ex rel. Griffith v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. DarnallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Miller v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  3. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. CarlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API