Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Miller v. Lane Rural High School District No. 9

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 26, 1952No. 38,548PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This was an action in quo warranto brought by the state on the relation of the county attorney of Miami county to test the validity of proceedings leading up to the organization of a joint rural high-school district and to oust the defendant local officials from exercising any and all rights and duties in connection with such district. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and defendants have appealed.

The background of the matter as found by the trial court in its findings of fact is as follows:

In July of 1949 a petition was presented to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schur v. Rural High-school District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Beck v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. McQueary v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. State ex rel. Dalton v. Joint Grenola Rural High School District No. 6Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Adamowski v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Gaski v. BasileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. CahillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  4. West v. Unified School District No. 346Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Stawitz v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API