Legal Opinion

Metro-Act of Rochester, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 30, 1981No. Nos. 79-2034, 79-2037PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion filed PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

Appellants challenge an order of the Federal Communications Commission granting short-term license renewals for two radio stations. Appellants claim that the Commission improperly considered the licensee’s 1 equal employment opportunity (EEO) statistics for a period postdating the expired license term,2 and that the licensee disregarded Commission regulations so flagrantly as to necessitate nonrenewal. Finding no legal impropriety in the Commission’s exercise of its authority and discretion, we affirm.

I

In 1972, Rust Communications Group, Inc., applied to the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alianza Federal De Mercedes v. Federal Communications Commission, Hubbard Broadcasting Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Columbus Broadcasting Coalition v. Federal Communications Commission, Wbns Tv, Inc., Radiohio, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Black Broadcasting Coalition of Richmond v. Federal Communications Commission, Roy H. Park Broadcasting of Virginia, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Bilingual Bicultural Coalition on Mass Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  5. Leflore Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Metro-Act of Rochester, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Rust Communications Group, Inc., Intervenor. Action for a Better Community v. Federal Communications Commission, Rust Communications Group, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API