Legal Opinion

Knox v. Decker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated February 9, 1998, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the defendants’ contention that the plaintiff’s action, which is based on General Municipal Law § 205-a, is barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see, Hoey v Kuchler, 249 AD2d 365; Zanghi v Greyhound Lines, 234 AD2d 930).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoey v. KuchlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Zanghi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API