Zanghi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that plaintiffs’ present action based upon General Municipal Law § 205-e is barred by res judicata. In plaintiffs’ previ*931ous action, Supreme Court denied defendant’s pretrial motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the action was tried in 1993, resulting in a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. On April 15, 1994, we reversed and granted defendant’s pretrial motion for summary judgment on the ground that the action was barred by the "fireman’s rule”, and the Court of Appeals affirmed on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Zanghi v. Niagara Frontier Transportation CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ruotolo v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Santangelo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Van Patten v. La PortaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoey v. KuchlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- 1701 Commerce Acquisition, LLC v. MacQuarie US Trading, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022
- Knox v. DeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Laura McClelland v. Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education in His Official Capacity; And Weatherford Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025