Legal Opinion

Cuenin v. Lakin

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1956No. Civ. 16936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AGEE, J. pro tem. *

William Henry Barnett and Mary A. Barnett were husband and wife. In June, 1929, they executed deeds of gift, each to the other, of certain real property owned by them. Mary died on May 7, 1935. Her daughter by a former marriage, Helene Cuenin, found the deed from William to Mary among her mother’s effects and caused it to be recorded. William later discovered this when making a loan application on the property. He went to an attorney, who advised a quiet title action. Helene was contacted and she agreed to act and appear as administratrix of her mother’s estate. The action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. City Street Improvement Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hedden v. WaldeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Potter v. BlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walters v. CalderonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Maben v. J. H. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Minderman v. PerryArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Minderman v. PerryArizona Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API