In Re Estate of Thorne
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.
Numerous defenses, in addition to the denial implied by law, were set up in the answer. The motion to direct a verdict was based upon a number of grounds, but counsel for.appellee rely in this court upon two propositions only, to sustain the action of the court below. This relieves us of the necessity of examining the other defenses or grounds of the motion.
I. It is said that the note was materially altered after its delivery. The document reads as follows:
'“The Carl-Leon Hotel,
“Independence Kansas.. “Nov. 26, 1904.
“Seven years after date I. promise to pay to the order of W. R. Jeffrey at the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Davis v. MunieIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Kauffman v. LoganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Shroeder v. WebsterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Bigelow v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Acme Feeds Inc. v. BergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Andrew v. IngvoldstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Finley v. ThorneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Hartwick v. HartwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Council Bluffs Savings Bank v. WendtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927