Legal Opinion

City of Atlanta v. Akins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 1967No. 42859PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. There is a motion to dismiss this appeal for noncompliance with Code Ann. § 24-2729, providing that the appellant shall pay all costs or file a pauper’s affidavit prior to the transmission of the record. In Aetna Cas. &c. Co. v. Sampley, 108 Ga. App. 617 (134 SE2d 71) it did not affirmatively appear that costs had not been paid, and this court indulged the presumption that the clerk of the trial court had done his duty and collected them nonetheless. Here there is an affirmative showing that no money was paid in prior to transmittal, countered by exhibits attached to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Information to Discipline Certain Attorneys of SanitaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Commonwealth Life & Accident Insurance v. Board of Review of the Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. BlackSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
  4. Vezzani v. VezzaniSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. McLellan v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hornsby v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. American Oil Co. v. McCluskeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Hogan v. City-County HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. American Casualty Company v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Coco v. School Committee of BoylstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API