Legal Opinion

Yatter v. Mathies

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

Plaintiff, suing under section 213 of the Civil Practice Act, asks judgment against whichever of the defendants is hable. Plaintiff’s intestate, as shipper-consignee, packed bristles in ten casks and delivered them to a shipowner in Riga, Latvia. His investigation after suit brought showed that the original carrier is not liable. He named that carrier (Mathies & Co., a partnership) in the title, but did not serve them. For some unexplained reason he named an insurance company in the title, although its liability seems independent of that of the other parties. He did not serve it. The proof…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S. & C. Clothing Co. v. United States Trucking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Pereira v. American Railway Express Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Remington v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NOPCO Chemical Division of Diamond Shamrock Chemical Co. v. Blaw-Knox Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Busset v. California Builders Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Yatter v. MathiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API