Jones v. Zimmerman
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
Julius J. Jones instituted an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution against the appellant, H. B. Zimmerman, and his employer, Matlock & Company, Inc., a corporation. At the trial both defendants demurred to the plaintiff’s evidence. The trial court sustained the demurrer of Matlock & ■Company, Inc., and overruled Zimmerman’s demurrer. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Zimmerman in the amount of $5,732.50. Zimmerman has appealed and has specified as error, among other things, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Messinger v. FultonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Haines v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Rowe v. Glen Elder State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Beaty v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Kennedy v. WagnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gary D. Patton, Cross-Appellant v. Albert E. Guyer, Martha Frances Guyer, Howard Fisher, D/B/A Fisher's I.G.A., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Howard v. FeltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Steadman v. TophamWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Crow v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Wisniski v. OngArizona Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.