Legal Opinion

Royal Surplus Lines Insurance v. Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided July 2, 2003No. 97-2499PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON VOIDNESS ISSUE

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge, Sitting by Designation.

This declaratory judgment action presents the issue of whether plaintiff Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“Royal”) and intervening plaintiffs The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ISOP”) and New Hampshire Insurance Company (“NHIC”) are obligated to pay claims and defense costs associated with orthopedic bone screw litigation under policies of insurance they issued to defendant Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. (“SDG”). A principal issue in the case is whether the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Volunteer State Life Ins. v. RichardsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Womack v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Dixon v. ManierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API