Legal Opinion

Womack v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1980PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

Plaintiff, Josephine Womack, sued to recover benefits under a health and accident policy. Defendant, Blue Cross and Blue Shield, defended on the ground that several questions on its application had not been answered truthfully by plaintiff. The trial judge submitted the case to the jury for a general verdict. The jury found for the plaintiff and awarded a twenty-five percent bad faith penalty. The trial judge eliminated the bad faith penalty but approved the verdict for the plaintiff for the sum due under the policy. The Court of Appeals reversed and dismissed, finding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cecil v. HardinTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mutual Life Ins. v. DibrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Sloop v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  4. Bauer v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  5. Tegethoff v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Kristen Cox MORRISON v. Paul ALLEN Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Hurley v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Menuskin v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Bruce Bagwell v. Canal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Smith v. Tennessee Farmers Life Reassurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API