Legal Opinion

Kawakami v. City & County of Honolulu, Board of Water Supply

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 2002No. 24523PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RAMIL, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Claimant-Appellant Richard S. Kawakami appeals the decision and order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (“Board”) denying his claim for worker’s compensation benefits for an injury sustained by Kawakami while operating a vehicle owned by his employer, the City and County of Honolulu Board of Water Supply (“BOWS”).

On appeal, Kawakami argues that the Board erred by: (1) failing to apply the presumption of worker’s compensation coverage under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (“HRS”) § 386-85 (1993); (2) concluding that Kawaka-mi had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chung v. Animal Clinic, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Royal State National Insurance v. Labor & Industrial Relations Appeal BoardHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Tate v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Carter v. Burn Construction Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Acoustic, Insulation & Drywall, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Appeal BoardHawaii Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brian Coblentz v. Tractor Supply Company (Dissenting)Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API