Legal Opinion

Kinkead v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1922No. 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Potter County; Henry S. Bishop, Judge. Action by H. E. Kinkead against Roy M. Clark and others. Judgment of dismissal, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

This is an action by appellant, Kinkead, against Roy M. Clark, a nonresident of the state of Texas and S. H. Richey and L. J. Gorman, residents of Potter county, Tex., to specifically perform a certain written contract, which shows to have been entered into by appellant and Roy M. Clark, whereby the latter, as owner of lots 9, 10, and 11, in block V236, of the Plemons addition to the town of Amarillo, Tex., granted to the appellant the exclusive privilege of sale of the lots for 30 days upon the consideration of $50 then paid, at a price of $1,100 on terms, one-fourth cash, and balance one,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. York v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hollander v. Central Metal & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  4. Hearst v. KuykendallTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Minero v. Ross and MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Twin Montana, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Texas Farm Mortg. Co. v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Hart v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Womacks v. HorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Hart v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API