Legal Opinion

Elliot v. Elliot

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1916No. 8,992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Wells Circuit Court; Wm. H. Eichhorn, Judge. Action by Samuel Elliot against the estate of Patrick H. Elliot, deceased, and from a judgment for plaintiff, Jack Elliot, as administrator of suck estate appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment in the court below against the estate of his son in the sum of $855.68. From this judgment an appeal has been prosecuted by appellant, assigning as error the *211overruling' of bis motion for a new trial. Tbe causes for a new trial, as presented by appellant’s brief for review, are: Tbat tbe verdict is not sustained by sufficient- evidence and is contrary to law; the admission of incompetent evidence; tbe giving of instruction No. 2 on tbe court’s own motion, and the refusal to give instruction No. 7 as requested by appellant.

Briefly tbe theory of appellant’s right…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pence v. MakepeaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Levering v. ShockeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hays v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Lowry v. DowneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Emhardt v. CollettIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. La Chance v. Ballard's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Masters v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API