H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Saldivar
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY, Justice.
Appellee, Diana Saldivar, brought suit against appellant, H.E. Butt Grocery Company, for false imprisonment. A jury found in favor of appellee and awarded her $10,000.00 for actual damages. In nine points of error, appellant complains the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment. We affirm.
On August 17,1985, appellee and several members of her family entered appellant’s store in Brownsville, Texas. After shopping for approximately thirty minutes, the group paid for their groceries and walked toward the exit Appellee had a pair of sunglasses clipped on her blouse…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Allied Finance Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Odem, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Richard Gladden, Cross-Appellee v. Randy W. Roach (Officer), and City of Denton, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Doe v. Angelina County, TexasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1990
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cockrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cockrell, Karl W., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.