Theodorou v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLyons, Justice
The statutory basis for the trial court’s order requiring restitution provides, in pertinent part, “[A]ll perpetrators of criminal activity or conduct [shall] be required to fully compensate all victims of such conduct or activity for any pecuniary loss, damage or injury as a direct or indirect result thereof.” § 15-18-65, Ala.Code 1975 (emphasis added). Section 15-18-66(4), Ala.Code 1975, defines “victim” as “[a]ny person whom the court determines has suffered a direct or indirect pecuniary damage as a result of the defendant’s criminal activities.” (Emphasis added.)
I concur in the main…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leonard v. Terminix Intern. Co., LPSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- United States v. Phillip Wayne BridgesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Ex Parte EversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- City of Mobile v. HavardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Strough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.