Legal Opinion
Dutko v. Lofthouse
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 1, 2008No. 3:06cv1270(MRK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. #37]. In her Complaint, Plaintiff Donna Dutko alleges that Defendants violated her constitutional rights when they excluded her property (“75 High”) from the Milford Center Design Development (“MCDD”) zone, a mixed-use zoned area adopted by the City of Milford on Decern- ber 2, 2003. See Complaint [doc. # 1]. Ms. Dutko’s property, which she purchased in 1994, was at the time of her purchase and is to this day zoned R-7.5, a residential zoned area.
I
The summary judgment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doninger v. NiehoffDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Musco Propane, LLP v. Town of WolcottDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Cabrera v. LawlorDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008