Legal Opinion

Comtel Technologies, Inc. v. Paul H. Schwendener, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 26, 2010No. Case 04 C 3879Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Comtel Technologies, Inc. (“Comtel”) and Solai & Cameron (“Solai”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) brought suit against Paul H. Schwendener, Inc. (“PHS”) and Nuline Technologies (“Nu-line”) alleging violations of Plaintiffs’ civil rights and bringing various tort claims related to Plainfield school construction projects for which PHS was the general contractor and the other parties were electrical subcontractors. Defendant American Home Assurance Company (“American”) issued a payment surety bond (“the Bond”) to PHS in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Larry D. Drake and Rosalie E. Drake v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API