Cobb v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston
Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, were convicted for receiving and concealing stolen property and sentenced to not more than three years in the State penitentiary. They have appealed and assigned error.
The first two assignments of error attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of the jury. We have examined the record and are of opinion that there.is no merit in this attack. The evidence adduced by the State amply shows that these two men were guilty of receiving and concealing' a safe belonging to one Glenn H. Dfirdin which had been stolen from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
- Huggins v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Commonwealth v. McGarveyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- State v. MissioTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. PirkeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
- O'BRIEN v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Williams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. ThibodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Payne v. StatedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.