Legal Opinion

State v. Pirkey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1908PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Nyman County. Hon. FraNK B. Smith, Judge. William Pirkey was convicted of buying and receiving stolen property, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

Upon an information duly filed by the state’s attorney of Lyman County the defendant was tried and convicted of the crime of buying and receiving, stolen propertv knowing the same to have been stolen, and from the judgment he has appealed to this court.

The first error assigned is that the court erred in overruling defendant’s demurrer to the information. ,To this information the following demurrer was interposed: “The defendant demurs to the information herein upon the ground: First, that more than one offense is charged, viz., buying stolen propertjr knowing the same to have been stolen,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ReddingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. State v. SakowskiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Cohen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  5. Du Bois v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. FenderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. BurttsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. HochmuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. State v. HermandsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. JerkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API