State v. Hirning
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Will probable cause exist to search a passenger when the driver admits to a highway patrol officer that drugs found in the car belong to all the occupants? As probable cause only requires reasonable, individualized suspicion, the all-encompassing admission, together with the other circumstances, created sufficient justification to search the passenger for drugs. We uphold the search and the resulting conviction for possession of methamphetamine.
Facts
[¶ 2.] On July 20,1997, at 2:30 a.m., Denise and Billy Mills and defendant, Milo Hirning, were traveling on Highway 12,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. StangaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LamontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FierroSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.