Legal Opinion

Mellon v. Minneapolis, St. P. &. S. S. M. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 2, 1923No. 3720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellee, plaintiff below, filed its bill praying an injunction to restrain defendant, Andrew W. Mellon, tbe Secretary of the Treasury, from requiring it to pay the wages of customs inspectors at night, on Sunday, and on holidays, who inspect the baggage of passengers on plaintiff’s trains at the Canadian border. Plaintiff also seeks to restrain the threatened refusal of defendant to permit plaintiff’s trains to enter the United States.

It appears that plaintiff operates three railroad lines entering the United States from Canada: One line from Winnipeg to St.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Railway Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Downton v. Yeager Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. United States v. GarlingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Mellon v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1926
  3. United States v. HawleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API