Legal Opinion

Downton v. Yeager Milling Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 7, 1883No. 257PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. The appellant was the complainant in the circuit court. He filed his bill to restrain the infringement by the appellee of certain letters patent, for which he made an application on March 20th, 1875, and which were issued to him on-April 20th following, for an “ improvement in processes of manufacturing middlings flour.”

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. The appellant was the complainant in the circuit court. He filed his bill to restrain the infringement by the appellee of certain letters patent, for which he made an application on March 20th, 1875, and which were issued to him on-April 20th following, for an “ improvement in processes of manufacturing middlings flour.” The state of - the art, and the purpose of the improvement which the patent was intended to cover, were set forth in the specification, as follows: “ This invention has for its aim the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods

A grain of wheat may be described generally as follows: It consists of a pellicle or outside covering known as bran, an inner envelop consisting of cells and their contents of gluten and phosphates, the most nutritious' portion of the berry, and an interior whitp mass composed mainly of starch and albuminoid matter, extending to the heart of the berry.' At one end of the berry, under an irregularly-curved surface layer of bran, technically called the’ shield, is the embryo or germ. The germ is a yellow, waxy substance, and the- bran is consistent and tough. It has always been the aim of good…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Cohn v. United States Corset Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Eames v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Harvey Coal & Coke Co. v. DillonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Maibohm v. RCA Victor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  5. Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API