Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Stumbo

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 22, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

More than three years after Floyd County voted dry, a petition was filed seeking an election on the wet and dry question in the Third Magisterial District of the County. The County Judge refused to call the election, and the appellant filed an action seeking a declaration of rights and a writ of mandamus requiring him to do so. The appeal is from a judgment upholding the position of the County Judge.

Since the adoption of the amendment to the Local Option Act, Chapter 21, Acts 1906, known as “The Cammack Act,” this Court has held consistently that, where a county votes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuson v. Howard, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  2. Murphy v. Menefee, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. McMullin v. Richmond City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howard v. SalyerKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ball v. HillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  3. Stice v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961
  4. Ball v. StumboCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API