Legal Opinion

McMullin v. Richmond City Council

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 31, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Van Sant, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellants, citizens of the City of Richmond, filed this action to enjoin the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board and the City Council of Richmond from issuing licenses, for the sale of alcoholic beverages, to the appellees, Paul Noland, Blane Clark, and Harry Ritter, on the ground that Chapter 47, Acts of 1948, creating KRS 242.125, amending KRS 242.030 and 242.050, and repealing KRS 242.210, contravenes both the Kentucky and Federal Constitutions. The Trial Court sustained the separate demurrers to the petition as amended and, upon appellants’ failure to plead…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Jones, Chief Safety Inspector v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Jones v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1928
  4. Mannini v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Fischer v. GriebCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StumboCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API